Reading the Data
Understanding Calculation Methods in Your Portfolio
Understanding Calculation Methods in Your Portfolio
You now have the option to choose between calculation methodologies. But what do they mean, and when should you use each?
You now have the option to choose between calculation methodologies. But what do they mean, and when should you use each?
Annual Averages or Reporting Averages
You now have the option to choose between calculation methodologies. But what do they mean, and when should you use each?
Annual Averages: The Complete Picture
What are they: Actual SOC levels measured for each individual year of your assessment.
Think of them like: Your farm’s annual rainfall records - some years higher, some lower, giving you the complete weather story.
Show real year-to-year variations
Reveal the complete data story
Useful for understanding what actually happened each year
Can be more volatile due to weather, seasonal effects
When to use Annual Averages:
Understanding which specific years had best/worst performance
Analyzing impact of management changes in specific years
Technical discussions with agronomists or soil scientists
Detailed operational planning
Reporting Averages: The Clear Trend
What are they: Smoothed values using 3-year averaging to show underlying trends in your soil carbon.
Think of them like: A weather forecast showing long-term climate patterns rather than daily fluctuations.
Clear, stable trends that are easy to understand
Less affected by unusual weather years or one-off events
Better for strategic planning and communication
Used in official reports and carbon credit applications
Latest year is always provisional (uses annual data until future data is available)
When to use Reporting Averages:
Presenting to investors, board members, or stakeholders
Strategic planning and long-term goal setting
Marketing and public communications
Carbon credit reporting and verification
Regulatory compliance
Real-World Example
Here’s how the same farm data would look using both calculation types:
Annual Averages (Complete Picture)
2019: 850 tonnes SOC
2020: 820 tonnes SOC (drought year - natural dip)
2021: 880 tonnes SOC
2022: 910 tonnes SOC
Reporting Averages (Clear Trend)
2020: 850 tonnes SOC (smoothed using 2019, 2020, 2021)
2021: 870 tonnes SOC (smoothed using 2020, 2021, 2022)
2022: 910 tonnes SOC âš ï¸ provisional - uses annual value
Key Insight: The reporting values clearly show an upward trend, while the annual values reveal that 2020 was an unusually challenging year. The most recent year (2022) is provisional because we need 2023 data to calculate the proper 3-year average.
Quick Reference: Which Values Should You Use?
Business Decisions & Communication
Use Reporting Averages
Designed to be stable and clear for strategic planning
Understanding What Happened
Use Annual Averages
Shows the complete story, including challenging years
Carbon Credit Programs
Use Reporting Averages
Specifically designed for regulatory and verification purposes
Q: Why are my annual averages more variable than my reporting averages?
Annual values show the real year-to-year changes, including impacts from weather, seasonal variations, and management changes. Reporting values smooth these out to show the underlying trend.
Q: Why does the latest year look the same in both annual and reporting averages?
The most recent year is “provisional” in reporting values because we need future data to calculate the 3-year average. Until next year’s data is available, the reporting value equals the annual value for that year.
Q: When will my latest year’s reporting value be finalized?
Once the following year’s data is processed, the previous year’s reporting value will be updated with the proper 3-year smoothed calculation.
Q: Which values should I use in my sustainability report?
Use reporting values. They provide a clearer picture of your long-term progress and are less likely to be misinterpreted by stakeholders.
Q: Do both values come from the same underlying data?
Yes, both come from the same satellite measurements of your property. The difference is in how they’re processed - annual values show raw yearly averages, while reporting values apply smoothing to reveal trends.
Q: Which values are more accurate?
Both are accurate for their intended purposes. Annual values accurately show what happened each year. Reporting values accurately show the overall trend by filtering out short-term variations.
Annual Averages or Reporting Averages
You now have the option to choose between calculation methodologies. But what do they mean, and when should you use each?
Annual Averages: The Complete Picture
What are they: Actual SOC levels measured for each individual year of your assessment.
Think of them like: Your farm’s annual rainfall records - some years higher, some lower, giving you the complete weather story.
Show real year-to-year variations
Reveal the complete data story
Useful for understanding what actually happened each year
Can be more volatile due to weather, seasonal effects
When to use Annual Averages:
Understanding which specific years had best/worst performance
Analyzing impact of management changes in specific years
Technical discussions with agronomists or soil scientists
Detailed operational planning
Reporting Averages: The Clear Trend
What are they: Smoothed values using 3-year averaging to show underlying trends in your soil carbon.
Think of them like: A weather forecast showing long-term climate patterns rather than daily fluctuations.
Clear, stable trends that are easy to understand
Less affected by unusual weather years or one-off events
Better for strategic planning and communication
Used in official reports and carbon credit applications
Latest year is always provisional (uses annual data until future data is available)
When to use Reporting Averages:
Presenting to investors, board members, or stakeholders
Strategic planning and long-term goal setting
Marketing and public communications
Carbon credit reporting and verification
Regulatory compliance
Real-World Example
Here’s how the same farm data would look using both calculation types:
Annual Averages (Complete Picture)
2019: 850 tonnes SOC
2020: 820 tonnes SOC (drought year - natural dip)
2021: 880 tonnes SOC
2022: 910 tonnes SOC
Reporting Averages (Clear Trend)
2020: 850 tonnes SOC (smoothed using 2019, 2020, 2021)
2021: 870 tonnes SOC (smoothed using 2020, 2021, 2022)
2022: 910 tonnes SOC âš ï¸ provisional - uses annual value
Key Insight: The reporting values clearly show an upward trend, while the annual values reveal that 2020 was an unusually challenging year. The most recent year (2022) is provisional because we need 2023 data to calculate the proper 3-year average.
Quick Reference: Which Values Should You Use?
Business Decisions & Communication
Use Reporting Averages
Designed to be stable and clear for strategic planning
Understanding What Happened
Use Annual Averages
Shows the complete story, including challenging years
Carbon Credit Programs
Use Reporting Averages
Specifically designed for regulatory and verification purposes
Q: Why are my annual averages more variable than my reporting averages?
Annual values show the real year-to-year changes, including impacts from weather, seasonal variations, and management changes. Reporting values smooth these out to show the underlying trend.
Q: Why does the latest year look the same in both annual and reporting averages?
The most recent year is “provisional” in reporting values because we need future data to calculate the 3-year average. Until next year’s data is available, the reporting value equals the annual value for that year.
Q: When will my latest year’s reporting value be finalized?
Once the following year’s data is processed, the previous year’s reporting value will be updated with the proper 3-year smoothed calculation.
Q: Which values should I use in my sustainability report?
Use reporting values. They provide a clearer picture of your long-term progress and are less likely to be misinterpreted by stakeholders.
Q: Do both values come from the same underlying data?
Yes, both come from the same satellite measurements of your property. The difference is in how they’re processed - annual values show raw yearly averages, while reporting values apply smoothing to reveal trends.
Q: Which values are more accurate?
Both are accurate for their intended purposes. Annual values accurately show what happened each year. Reporting values accurately show the overall trend by filtering out short-term variations.